At Griffith, we’re committed to maintaining an environment that fosters responsible research
Many elements typify a responsible research culture, including honesty and integrity, respect for human research participants, animals and environment, good stewardship of the research resources and the responsible communication of results. We believe research ethics and integrity should go beyond compliance and be regarded as key in research design, conduct and reporting of results. In part, this is a response to:
- the valid expectations of the wider community, which funds and supports research activities
- our responsibilities to the human and animal participants in our work
- the professions, academia and community who will rely on the accuracy of our work.
Integrity matters
At Griffith, research integrity covers matters such as:
- the appropriate expertise of our researchers
- the training of new researchers, including research students
- adhering to ethical standards
- the appropriate disclosure and response to conflicts of interest
- the responsible management of research data
- the dissemination of the results of research
- authorship, peer review and collaborations between institutions
- response to concerns or complaints relating to research misconduct.
Responsible Conduct of Research
National Code
In 2018 the National Health and Medical Research Council, the Australian Research Council and Universities Australia released the revised Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research. This document articulates the national standards on research integrity matters to inform the responsible conduct of research.
Griffith University's Responsible Conduct of Research policy
In 2018, the University approved The Responsible Conduct of Research policy. This document is our implementation of the revised Australian Code and applies to all research at Griffith. The policy is supported by the Research Integrity Breach Investigation Procedure.
Responsible use of AI
There is a lot to consider when thinking about how AI tools can be used for your research. Basic principles of research integrity still apply when using these tools. Griffith University has developed a number of resources to assist you in navigating AI in research.
Research Integrity Training
The Office for Research has developed an online Research Integrity Foundations course which is available through Learning@Griffith. Academic staff and HDR Candidates should complete this course, and can self-enrol here.
Aboriginal Knowledge and Intellectual Property Protocol Community Guide
This Community Guide is an adaptation of the Desert Knowledge CRC Aboriginal Knowledge and Intellectual Property Protocol.
Research integrity resource sheets
Our resource sheets cover the various components of research integrity at Griffith. You can access the full set as a PDF or download individual sheets below:
- #1 Introduction to research integrity at Griffith University (PDF 516k)
- #2 The 2018 version of the Australian Code: What's new? (PDF 751k)
- #3 Planning and conducting a project responsibly (PDF 383k)
- #4 Responsible research outputs (PDF 600k)
- #5 Responsible management of data (PDF 562k)
- #6 Collaborative research: Hints and Tips (PDF 440k)
- #7 The Responsible Supervisor (PDF 431k)
- #8 The Responsible HDR Candidate (PDF 577k)
- #9 Conflicts of interest and research (PDF 736k)
- #10 Tips for peer review (PDF 391k)
- #11 Disputes between researchers (PDF 391k)
- #13 Research Integrity Advisers (PDF 391k)
- HDR candidate authorship resource paper (PDF 194k)
- #17 Artificial Intelligence and research outputs (PDF 359k)
Further Resources
- Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research - 2018 (PDF)
- Collaborative Research Checklist (PDF 17k)
- Revisiting: Six Years of Predatory Publishing - Scholarly Kitchen - 2018 Discussion piece
- Open access, power, and privilege - Paper (2018)
- Managing Conflicts of Interest in the Public Sector - CCC/ICAC
- Everything You Need to Know About Conflicts of Interest (Part 1) - Psychology Today - 2017 Discussion piece
- COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers - 2017 (PDF)
- COPE Research integrity Resources
- How much text recycling is okay? - Retraction Watch (2017)
Fact Sheet - Research Integrity Advisors
A fact sheet to inform about the University's network of Research Integrity Advisors (RIAs) and to provide guidance around research integrity, the Code and the role of RIAs in providing initial advice.
Authorship agreement form
This form is to be used by Griffith University research collaborators to record agreements with regards to the authorship of research outputs.
Authorship decision support tool
Professor Frederic Leusch (Dean Research - Science) has developed an "authorship decision support tool" to help start a conversation on authorship.
- Authorship Decision Support Tool
How to use the tool:
Step 1: List everyone who contributed to the work
Step 2: Assign them a score across all four areas (Idea, work, writing, stewardship) from 0 (none) to 3 (essential)
Step 3: Look at the sum of points, and consider the tool's recommendations
Step 4: Begin a respectful conversation on authorship with your colleagues
Research data management
Research data is gathered or generated with the aim of conducting analysis and generating original research findings. Effective data management encompasses the storage, organisation and sharing of this valuable data. For more information about best practices in research data management, we invite you to explore our self-paced online training module. Additionally, you can find valuable data management guides below.
- Off-site storage of research data (log-in required).
- Research data management training module
Research Integrity Advisers
Griffith University has appointed a network of experienced researchers to act as a source of collegiate advisers on research integrity matters. RIAs are not involved in the conduct of investigations into allegations of breaches of the Australian Code/Griffith Code but can be a source of advice to complainants or respondents.
Research Integrity Breach Investigation Procedure
This Procedure sets out the principles and procedures for the receiving, investigating and management of potential breaches of the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research, 2018 (the Code). It is informed by the Guide to Managing and Investigating Potential Breaches of the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research (The Investigation Guide 2018) and Griffith University’s Responsible Conduct of Research Policy.
Animal ethics complaints
Booklet 01 of our Animal Ethics Manual also details processes for responding to complaints, alleged breaches of ethical standards, or appeals against decisions.
International Resources
- US Office for Research Integrity
- Misconduct Case Summaries
- Video Case Studies
- Understanding the complexities of retractions
- Avoiding Plagiarism, Self-plagiarism, and Other Questionable Writing Practices: A Guide to Ethical Writing (US Office for Research Integrity 2015)
- PHS/NIH Project Financial Conflict of Interest (FCOI) Protocol
Research Integrity Advisers
Griffith researchers can consult our Research Integrity Advisers for advice about research conduct issues.